Well CES 2010 is over and at least as far a monitors are concerned it looks like the big push is for 3D. Both TV’s and stand alone computer monitors are quickly adopting this new technology. My question is why? Also why was it federally mandated that every broadcast in america go high definition by a certain date? I realize that technology is constantly evolving but this rapid change over is crazy. It seems like in a year or so if you want to experience everything an entertainment package (be it blu-ray, or video game) has to offer you will need a new 3D monitor of some sort, and they aren’t coming cheap, especially with the economy the way it is now. OK I guess the High Definition mandated change was ok, but with the industry now putting a de-facto 3D change very quickly after everyone bought HDMI compliant TVs it seems like to much to quick. Granted standard HDMI TVs will continue to display content, the viewer just won’t be able to completely experience all content, and yes I may strive to be an early apoter of technology so I hear about these products before the average person. I guess I just wish the industry would just have waited a few years before trying to revolutionize the monitor industy yet again. At the very least it would have given them more time to beta test the new hardware/software. Also to accomplish the 3-D effects we will have to go back to 1950′s tech. That’s right the 3-D glasses are getting polished and sent back out to the consumer. So not only will you have to buy a new TV, but you will have to wear funky glasses to get the full effect. I am not saying that I don’t like the idea of realistist movement being interperted by my brain, far form it I enjoy the idea of bieng fully imersed in an entainment situation, but I think the industy is moving too quick on this and needs to let consumers get used to the idea of non 3-D high deffinition entertainment, before complicating the market even more with this new addition of the 3-D aspect.
